Challenges and progress in oxygen evolution reaction catalyst development for seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production

Production of green hydrogen on a large scale can negatively impact freshwater resources. Therefore, using seawater as an electrolyte in electrolysis is a desirable alternative to reduce costs and freshwater reliance. However, there are limitations to this approach, primarily due to the catalyst involved in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In seawater, the OER features sluggish kinetics and complicated chemical reactions that compete. This review first introduces the benefits and challenges of direct seawater electrolysis and then summarises recent research into cost-effective and durable OER electrocatalysts. Different modification methods for nickel-based electrocatalysts are thoroughly reviewed, and promising electrocatalysts that the authors believe deserve further exploration have been highlighted.


Introduction
The intermittent nature of renewable energy poses a signicant challenge to grid stability.An energy storage system is necessary to bridge the gap between power generation and demand, enhancing energy system resilience and cost efficiency.Hydrogen holds immense potential for decarbonising society, with a remarkably high caloric value of 120-142 MJ kg −1 , about 2.5 times that of fossil fuels. 1,2Conventionally, hydrogen is produced by an extensive process plant that reforms hydrocarbons to hydrogen, and up to 99% of hydrogen produced today comes from this method. 3In contrast, water electrolysis provides a clean route to hydrogen from water without the consumption of fossil fuels or the emission of CO 2 .If the electricity comes from renewable energy sources, water electrolysis becomes a truly green technology. 4,5xisting water electrolysis plants consist of stacks of multiple cells with an aqueous alkaline electrolyte and a porous separator.The maximum current density for water electrolysis is usually around 0.25 A cm −2 , and the energy efficiency is only about ∼60%. 4 To overcome these limitations, solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) water electrolysers have been developed. 4,5SPE electrolysers that operate in acidic conditions signicantly

Zhenyu Zhang
Zhenyu Zhang is now a lecturer of renewable energy in the University of Exeter, Cornwall campus since 2023.Aer obtaining his PhD degree from the City University of Hong Kong in 2016, he became a postdoctoral fellow at Faraday Institution at University College London, focusing on the in situ analysis of the degradation mechanism of electrode/ electrolyte materials in electrochemical batteries.His research covers synthesising and characterising nanomaterials, graphene and other inorganic materials, solid-state electrolyte materials, and their energy conversion and storage applications.

Yanqui Zhu
Yanqiu Zhu is the chair of functional materials at the University of Exeter.He received his BSc and MSc degrees in Materials Science from Harbin Institute of Technology (Harbin, China) in 1989 and 1992, respectively, then moved to Tsinghua University (Beijing, China) to study carbon nanotubes with Prof D H Wu and obtained his PhD degree in Materials Science in 1996.His main area of expertise is experimental synthesis, the characterisation of advanced nanomaterials and nanocomposites with interesting functionalities, and the covering of fundamental nanomaterial science and the development of applied nanocomposites.

Xiaohong Li
Xiaohong Li is a professor of energy storage and director of global development in the Renewable Energy Group at the University of Exeter.She holds a PhD in Physical Chemistry from joint education of Peking University and Lanzhou University, a MSc in Analytical Chemistry, and a BSc in Organic Chemistry from Lanzhou University.Her research interest is focused on energy storage, emphasising redox ow batteries, anion exchange membrane water electrolysers for hydrogen production, and nanoscale materials for electrocatalysis.
current capital and operational expenditure (CAPEX and OPEX) of incumbent desalination technology (reverse osmosis (RO)), the impact of purifying seawater is negligible and only increases the total cost of the hydrogen produced by 1%. 12 This appears to be a case-closed type analysis; however, caution is required; the authors mention the complexity of comparing a highly mature technology and a technology in the early stages of development.It is essential to highlight that while desalination accounts for a small percentage of cost, in comparison to the CAPEX of proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers, it is estimated that the CAPEX of electrolysers will reduce by 60-64% by 2025 and 68-72% by 2030, 13 specically with the rise of anion exchange membranes (AEMs), that utilise non-precious metals for catalysts, this cost disparity will decrease, and the cost of a desalinated water source will account for a more signicant portion of the system, reducing the cost-benet.Furthermore, the cost of desalinated water is approx.0.2-3.2$ per m 3 using conventional energy sources, but this would appear counterintuitive when trying to create 'green hydrogen'; thus, using renewable sources for the energy, the price increases to 4-11 $ per m 3 for desalinated water. 12Moreover, the purity of water required for commercial electrolysers is exceptionally high (impurities <10 ppm), which demands repeated processing from RO, which escalates costs. 12,14,15Perhaps the most important factor to mention is the effect of scale; RO plants are large installations, producing from 10 000 m 3 to 1 million m 3 of water per day. 16This is because the CAPEX of RO plants is heavily dependent on plant size due to economies of scale. 16,17The largest commercial electrolysers are approximately 10 MW and require 125 m 3 of water per day, demonstrating a signicant mismatch and constructing smaller, dedicated desalination plants for non-centralized hydrogen production is even less viable. 17he direct electrolysis of seawater offers a range of benets, from reduced costs due to a simplied system to potential dormant metal recovery, 18 but corrosion and low hydrogen purity challenges persist. 18,19Water electrolysis technologies such as PEM and alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) require ultra-puried water, a concern when scaling production. 20,21Freshwater constitutes only 3% of Earth's water, with seawater comprising 97% (Fig. 1).Seawater's complex composition hinders the maturation of direct seawater electrolysis (DSWE) technologies.PEM water electrolysis outperforms DSWE, but introducing water with impurities greater than 300 ppm into PEM systems can lead to noble metal catalyst poisoning and stack failure. 20,22As a result, DSWE provides an attractive alternative to freshwater electrolysis by overcoming these challenges, alleviating global freshwater demand and tapping into an almost boundless fuel source.
Seawater's high chloride concentration (0.5 mol dm −3 ) can trigger side reactions such as the chlorine evolution reaction (ClER) that compete with the desired anodic processes, thus impacting electrolyser performance and creating toxic chlorine products. 23Additionally, seawater's abundance of cations such as magnesium and calcium can precipitate as hydroxides on the surface of the cathode; prolonged exposure raises the pH at the cathode surface, leading to deposit accumulation that obstructs gas evolution and poisons the electrocatalyst. 24Moreover, the presence of bacteria and microorganisms in natural seawater can lead to the poisoning of electrodes and membranes, thereby limiting long-term stability. 14To be viable, DSWE must show industrial-scale attributes, including current densities >1 A cm −2 , cell voltages below 2 V, and stack stability >60 000 hours. 12 In recent years, there has been a rapid growth in scientic reports concerning seawater electrolysis, 25 representing an active area of scientic investigation.A substantial increase in corresponding review papers mirrors this trend.Notably, attention from reviewers has predominantly centred on electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), driven by the intricate anodic chemistry, with some addressing this topic exclusively. 25,268][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] These review papers exhibit a common structural framework, oen featuring four main discussion sections.Of the four main sections, analysis of types of compounds (e.g.sulphides, phosphides and oxides/ hydroxides) and unique design criteria of electrocatalysts (hierarchical structure and corrosion resistant layers) are the most popular structures and what we summarise predominantly in this review.40,41 Subsequent review papers 1,28,29,31,33,41,42 split electrocatalysts into abundancy, with a focus on earth-abundant electrocatalysts for seawater splitting, moving away from precious metal and platinum group metals, which are limited in applications by cost.A few reviews focused on electrolyte conditions instead of catalyst development, analysing the impact of varying pH.This review investigates state-of-the-art OER electrocatalysts for seawater electrolysis capable of operating at current densities $100 mA cm −2 for hydrogen production.The review aims to add novelty by investigating modication techniques not seen in the majority of review papers (ion selectivity) and by adding essential critical evaluation to discuss high-performance of modied OER electrocatalysts for seawater electrolysis, highlighting key parameters of recent research that can lead to the development of low-cost, highly efficient earth-abundant electrocatalysts for direct seawater electrolysis.

General electrochemistry of water electrolysis
The water-splitting reaction requires an external stimulus, i.e. a potential difference between two electrodes, to drive the overall cell reaction.Since the average pH for seawater is 8.2, the electrode reactions for water electrolysis in alkaline solutions are most relevant.They are shown in eqn ( 1) and ( 2), with the overall reaction in eqn (3).An alkaline electrolyte solution also allows the use of non-precious metal electrocatalysts, which is the main focus of this review.
Cathode, HER Overall cell reaction Under standard conditions, a minimum potential of 1.23 V is required to commence the decomposition of water into H 2 and O 2 . 44The standard enthalpy, DH o , for reaction (3) is +286 kJ mol −1 of H 2 and the Gibbs energy, DG o , is +238 kJ mol −1 of H 2 . 44n practice, the cell voltage to drive the water electrolysis reaction is given by eqn (4).
where DE e is the difference in the equilibrium potentials for the two electrode reactions (1.23 V), and the other terms are inef-ciencies that lead to increased energy consumption and should, therefore, be minimised; h a and h c are the overpotentials at the anode and cathode, respectively while IR is the ohmic losses due to current (I) owing through the cell with resistance R. The h terms can be minimised using highperformance electrocatalysts, while minimising the IR term depends on good electrochemical engineering. 44he reaction kinetics of both anodic and cathodic reactions depend greatly on the electrocatalyst used.The anodic overpotential for OER is signicantly larger than the cathodic overpotential and is a signicant source of energy loss in water electrolysis cells.Hence, reducing anodic overpotential is the critical target in alkaline water electrolysis.This review will discuss OER electrocatalysts in conditions appropriate to DSWE.

Competition between OER and ClER
Seawater composition constitutes primarily water with 3.5% salts by weight.Of the dissolved ions, chloride (Cl − ) accounts for 55.04%, followed by sodium (Na + ) at 30.61%; this is why approximately 0.5 M NaCl solution is commonly employed in simulated seawater. 34Other ions such as sulfate (7.76%), magnesium (3.69%), calcium (1.16%), potassium (1.10%), bicarbonate (0.41%), bromide (0.19%), borate (0.07%) and strontium (0.04%) can interfere with reactions at either electrode.However, the effect of Cl − is the primary focus here due to its high concentration, causing competing reactions to the desired evolution of oxygen.The competition between chlorine evolution and oxygen evolution can be represented as a Pourbaix diagram (Fig. 2).
At pH 0, At pH 14, Chloride electro-oxidation chemistry is complex, with different reactions occurring depending on the pH, temperature, and applied potential.Fig. 2 demonstrates the potential-pH zones where the OER and chloride oxidation reactions become thermodynamically possible.For simplicity, a temperature of 298 K is considered a standard temperature, with a chloride concentration at 0.5 M (C T, Cl ), a typical chloride salt concentration in seawater.The green line illustrates the thermodynamic equilibrium before water decomposes to oxygen.The OER reaction is thermodynamically favourable if electrode potentials are more positive than the green line, and chlorine oxidation is favoured if the potential is above the pink line (eqn (6)).Therefore, there is a potential window of ∼480 mV for an alkaline environment where oxygen evolution is possible without the oxidation of chlorine, as shown in the blue highlighted area.The red line demonstrates the competition between the chlorine oxidation reaction (ClOR) and the gaseous evolution of chlorine (eqn (5)). 45 Challenges to seawater splitting

General challenges
Electrolysis in seawater can be complicated at the cathode due to the interference of ions and pH uctuations, which hinders reactions. 24Unbuffered seawater has slower kinetics for the HER, which can lead to local pH changes at the cathode surface, causing the precipitation of dissolved ions. 33,38When the pH uctuates above 9.5, it can result in catalyst degradation and the precipitation of magnesium hydroxide (Fig. 3) and calcium hydroxide, obstructing active sites and reducing the electrode activity.Salt deposits, microbes, bacteria, and small particles can also be challenging to eliminate but can be minimised by introducing turbulence, supporting electrolytes, and selecting appropriate catalysts and current densities. 14,24,46hile extensive research has been conducted on seawater salts, limited data is available on microorganisms and their implications on DSWE. 25 Existing studies on microorganisms lack comprehensive investigations, making this aspect relatively underexplored.Studies comparing water splitting in simulated seawater to actual seawater note a decrease in the current density achieved or an increase in overpotential but fail to explain the precise chemistry causing the reduced performance.In seawater electrolysis, biofouling is a primary challenge that can lead to active site blockage, membrane complications, and reduced equipment lifespan. 25,48Despite efforts to mitigate this issue, implementing direct seawater applications may introduce complications, such as the necessity for multiple coatings on electrodes, potentially affecting catalytic performance. 25,49,50

Challenges in terms of OER catalysts
To efficiently produce H 2 through DSWE, a highly selective OER catalyst is required.][53][54] Under highly alkaline conditions, the product of the ClER is altered from hypochlorous acid to hypochlorite, denoted as the chlorine oxidation reaction (ClOR) (eqn (7)).ClO − also has a kinetic advantage over the OER under standard conditions (25 °C and 0.5 M), but the OER is still more thermodynamically favourable. 54,55The standard hypochlorite redox potential is heavily inuenced by pH; the gradient of the slope of pH dependency is identical to the OER potential slope in the Pourbaix diagram (Fig. 2). 55The potential for ClO − formation is ∼480 mV higher than the potential for OER in alkaline solutions. 52Therefore, if electrocatalytic oxidation can operate at less than 1.72 V RHE for complete seawater electrolysis and at an overpotential of the OER less than 480 mV in alkaline electrolytes, theoretically, no hypochlorite is formed, as it is thermodynamically suppressed in this potential region and approximately 100% selectivity will be achieved. 52,56This is how the activity of OER electrocatalysts is measured in DSWE literature, the overpotential in relation to the theoretical threshold of 480 mV.
As a result, a design criterion is proposed for selective OER control, where at pH greater than 7.5, the reaction is given: 55 h OER < 480 mV, at pH > 7.5 Fig. 4 shows that for a 100% selective OER region below 480 mV, pH must be at least 7.5; decreasing pH reduces the potential required for ClOR to compete with OER.Anode catalysts must be highly selective to minimise the creation of highly corrosive hypochlorite during seawater electrolysis. 14

Strategy to design OER catalysts for DSWE
The pH of natural seawater depends on depth, latitude, and other conditions.However, it is widely considered to be in the  range of pH 8 to 8.3, 57 classifying it as an alkaline solution.The design criteria for alkaline OER catalysts are based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations, and saline water is a nonbuffered electrolyte.Applying an additive (1 mol dm −3 of KOH) is commonly used to prevent changes in the local pH during electrolysis and aid ion selectivity.Nickel is widely recognised for its excellent OER activity and signicant corrosion-resistant properties in alkaline solutions, making it an ideal component of electrode materials for use at various levels of alkalinity and temperature conditions. 58Nickel and its alloys possess a desirable suite of characteristics, rendering them highly suitable for deployment in seawater (alkaline) environments, whether as the primary catalyst material or as the substrate.Nickel is a costeffective electrode material relative to platinum group metals (PGMs) and possesses good electrical conductivity due to its loosely bound valence electrons.

Nickel and iron layered double hydroxides (LDHs)
Nickel LDHs are becoming ever more popular electrocatalysts for alkaline seawater electrolysis.1][62] Positively charged divalent cations such as Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , Co 2+ , Cu 2+ , and Mg 2+ construct positively charged layers while intercalated anions can be easily modied to SO 4 2− , Br − or PO 4 3− . 63A key attribute of LDHs lies in their ability to retain the interlayer spaces, allowing for the effective accommodation of a diverse range of anionic species. 60This inherent exibility makes LDHs well-suited for various applications, including DSWE, specically for the electrostatic repulsion strategy to mitigate chloride corrosion. 60able 1 lists some of the best performing LDH DSWE catalysts.Using carbon cloth (CC) as a substrate is common throughout the literature due to the excellent catalyst substrate contact created by abundant nano-to-microscale pores on the CC surface, offering signicant area for electrochemical reactions and electrolyte interactions. 64However, carbon is unstable at high anodic potentials because the standard potential for carbon oxidation is 0.207 V vs. RHE, meaning carbon corrosion is expected at elevated anodic potentials and inevitably leads to electrode deterioration. 67Dong et al. reported a range of NiFe-LDHs on carbon bre cloth with varying atomic ratios.The NiFe-LDH-6-4/CC was fabricated simply on a CC by application of mild chemical methods conducted under atmospheric pressure and temperature lower than 100 °C (Fig. 6a). 64Since NiFe-LDHs are a well-established OER catalyst, the ratio of nickel to iron has been a research focus; a lot of studies are in agreement with Li et al. 68 who identied that small additions of iron in the composition of nickel to iron, enhanced the activity and rate of OER.In contrast, more signicant additions  counteracted the OER activity, and where iron additions outweigh nickel, the performance is worse than pure nickel; Dong et al. further conrm this point. 64,68A nickel-to-Fe ratio of 6 : 4 demonstrated the best activity, performance and stability in 1 M KOH & seawater, affording an overpotential of 301 mV at 100 mA cm −2 and remaining consistently at that potential for 165 h. 64By increasing the content of nickel, higher activity and a smaller overpotential are achieved owing to nickel's high conductivity and the redistribution of nickel and Fe atoms in the catalyst, which bonds O 2− and increases the electrochemical active sites. 64,69,70u et al. also investigated a NiFe-LDH on CC, denoted (NiFe-LDH/CC).It is synthesised using a two-step hydrothermal method to grow "sheet-shaped" NiFe hydroxide on the CC support. 65NiFe-LDH/CC is tested systematically in various electrolyte conditions with varying amounts of KOH and seawater in each stability test.Ten-hours constant current tests were conducted during this study at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 .The results indicate that as the concentration of KOH decreases and the volume of seawater increases, a greater overpotential is presented, 65 as would be anticipated (Fig. 6b).At 100 mA cm −2 , in pure seawater (no additional buffer), NiFe-LDH/CC exhibited an overpotential rise of 370 mV over the period, indicating a degradation rate of 37 mV h −1 , signicantly higher than comparable catalysts, 71,72 showing further overpotentials with an extended test, would shi this catalyst into the region of competition between ClOR and OER.There is no mention from the authors what specic component caused this, but it is likely there was corrosion of the substrate due to carbon's instability at higher anodic potentials.However, this is operating in pure seawater.Thus, the conductivity of the solution will be signicantly less.Overall, it is benecial to the research area to learn about the inuence of varying concentrations of seawater and the implication on one of the betterperforming earth-abundant OER electrocatalysts (NiFe-LDH).
Nickel foam (NF) is a commonly used substrate material in literature due to its plentiful active sites and 3D hierarchical structure with high porosity and a suitable catalyst substrate connection, even simply dipping within a solution. 66Ning et al. reported a NiFe-LDH on an NF substrate (Fig. 6c).NiFe-LDH is synthesised via immersion in a solution at room temperature for a period ranging from 1 to 5 hours to create NiFe-LDH on the substrate. 66The one-step spontaneous reaction for NiFe-LDH deposition is facile and time-effective, but it could be argued that there will be a fragile bond between the catalyst and substrate via this synthesis.The NiFe-LDH nanosheets are a product of the oxidation of Fe 2+ ions, an aspect that is typically avoided in electrodeposition techniques.However, this study utilises the Fe 2+ to Fe 3+ oxidation to create an exceedingly active OER electrocatalyst. 66,73,74The tested electrolyte compositions include 1 M KOH, 1 M KOH, 0.5 M NaCl, 1 M KOH, 1 M NaCl, and 1 M KOH and seawater.Similar to most NiFe-LDH catalysts reported in the literature, the catalyst's performance is good, with current densities of 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 achieved with overpotentials of 247 mV and 296 mV, respectively.It was noted that activity within the seawater electrolyte was lower due to the poisoning effect of the impurities within seawater, 66 an aspect not considered when using simulated seawater as an electrolyte.Stability is also of utmost importance in catalyst development, NiFe-LDH/NF reveals good performance over a 100 h test in varying electrolytes, even at current densities of 500 mA cm −2 , demonstrating its potential for industry applications. 66

Nickel and iron mixed metal oxides
Mixed metal oxides have recently proven excellent performance in seawater electrolytes.Studies have investigated the creation of various metal oxide compounds to exploit the synergetic effect of different metal species and optimise corrosion prevention while improving OER performance. 56,75,76Ul Haq et al. synthesised a novel structure of graphitic carbon nitridesupported nickel-iron oxide (NiO x -FeO x @g-C 3 N 4 ).Synthesis of NiO x -FeO x (Fig. 7a) is prepared using Ni 2+ bis(acetylacetonate) and Fe 3+ tris(acetylacetonate), oen abbreviated as Ni 3 (acac) 2 and Fe(acac) 3 , respectively, in the presence of oleyl amine and oleic acid. 77The oleylamine controlled the nucleation rate and acted as a reducing agent, while the oleic acid was responsible for bonding metal ions to the substrate, creating homogeneous growth of nanoclusters (NCs) and acting as the capping agent, as a result leading to a smoother catalyst morphology.The Ndoped carbon was selected due to its desirable corrosion resistance and tunable surface chemistry. 77,78The synthesis of the NiO x -FeO x @g-C 3 N 4 is complex, consisting of ve different in-depth processes, which may be a barrier to scaling up.

Review
RSC Advances 380 mV overpotential was required to achieve a current density of 1000 mA cm −2 , with sustained performance for more than 100 hours in 1 M KOH + seawater at ambient temperature while the formation of hypochlorite was suppressed. 77This corrosion resistance can be linked to the N-doped carbon (g-C 3 N 4 ) support, which protects from stress and pitting corrosion by forming pand d-bonds between the nuclei of carbon and N atoms while reducing interfacial resistance amongst OER intermediates and active sites. 77Experimental evidence revealed no substrate oxidation occurred with the g-C 3 N 4 support while preserving the active sites. 77iO x -FeO x @g-C 3 N 4 provides valuable insights for the future development of OER electrocatalysts and could serve as valuable research for further investigation, particularly because of the performance achieved in natural seawater electrolyte.This study's graphitic carbon nitride support provides valuable analysis for further work to build upon and demonstrates signicant corrosion benets within a seawater environment.
Table 2 shows some high performance mixed metal oxide DSWE catalysts.This further conrms the benet of mixed metal oxides for alkaline seawater splitting and emphasises the importance of simplicity when synthesising catalysts.Xu et al. 79 in 2023 synthesised a (Ni/Fe/Mo) (oxy)hydroxides (OOH) catalyst on a nickel foam (NF) substrate via a simple, low-cost, onestep immersion synthesis at room temperature.The one-step synthesis (Fig. 7b) requires only a 5 minutes immersion in easily obtainable and cost-effective reagents (Fig. 7b); this study aims to prove that complex and expensive equipment is not necessary for creating highly active and stable electrocatalysts for seawater electrolysis.NF is used as the source of nickel and as the substrate to grow the (Ni/Fe/Mo)OOH.Despite the limited immersion time, catalyst coverage on the substrate is good, with cluster structure diameter ranging from 1 mm to 10 mm and the morphology is relatively uniform (Fig. 7d).The authors observe a trend that increasing the immersion time (Fig. 7c), results in greater catalyst attachment on the substrate framework, however, it is not clear why a longer immersion than 5 minutes wasn't used to increase the amount of catalyst on the substrate.OER performance of (Ni/ Fe/Mo)OOH was investigated in 1 M KOH and seawater, where it presented overpotentials of 330, 416 and 514 mV at 100, 400 and 1000 mA cm −2 , respectively.Comparably higher overpotentials than NiO x -FeO x @g-C 3 N 4 and a concerningly high overpotential at 1000 mA cm −2 of 514 mV, operating in a region where the ClOR can evolve readily.Further to this, the catalyst can operate stably in 1 M KOH and seawater at 100 mA cm −2 for 72 h, with only an increase in voltage of 10 mV, indicating a 0.14 mV h −1 degradation rate, which is relatively low compared to other electrocatalysts analysed in this review and impressive considering the simplicity and efficiency of synthesis.This work is an insightful and valuable study for further research on simple, cheap and effective OER electrocatalysts.A lot of benets can be derived from such a simple synthesis; considering the impressive performance of an alkaline seawater electrolyte, more effort is needed to improve the conductivity and activity of the catalyst to reduce the overpotential at higher current densities.

Modication techniques
4.4.1.Doping.Doping, whether metallic or anionic, is an increasingly popular technique for improving catalytic performance, stability and corrosion protection.1][82] Anionic doping is commonly used to improve the stability and corrosion resistance to Cl − ions within seawater due to the negative charge that repels Cl − .4.4.1.1.Metallic dopants (Co, Mn, Ag, Ir).State-of-the-art electrocatalysts commonly comprise platinum group metals like iridium, platinum, and palladium.These are valued for their low overpotentials and Tafel slopes, particularly in acidic conditions. 63,83,84However, the widespread commercial use of these metals is limited due to their high cost and scarcity. 85,86ubsequently, research has focused on reducing the precious metal loadings in electrocatalysts for seawater splitting, aiming to achieve cost-effective solutions.Combining platinum group metals with nickel can help tune electronic structures and improve charge transfer, exposing more active sites and reducing costs.Table 3 lists some examples of metallic doped OER catalysts.
Precious metal doping of transition metal LDHs is an increasingly common research area for creating efficient OER electrocatalysts and reducing precious metal loading.Ag doping has been found to increase abundant active sites and improve electron transfer, enhancing OER activity. 80Liu et al. synthesised a NiFe-LDH catalyst supported by Ag via a one-step redox reaction on nickel foam, where Ag was supported on top of a NiFe-LDH catalyst.Ag incorporation increased the phase stability of the NiFe-LDH, and any exposed Ag nanowire operated as active sites, helping to release OH − adsorbates from the active sites.Using Ag as a dopant enables the catalyst to reach the current densities necessary for industrial applications, which is why the authors selected Ag.The Ag/NiFe-LDH demonstrated improved conductivity, increased number of active sites and enhanced surface area compared to NiFe-LDH. 80g/NiFe-LDH showed excellent durability with an operation of 1000 hours in alkaline natural seawater (1 M KOH + seawater) with a small overpotential of 303 mV at 1000 mA cm −2 and can serve as a valuable touchstone for future work.
Introducing a 5d precious metal, iridium, to a Ni-LDH achieves better electron transfer performance as the electron interaction between nickel and Ir optimises electron structure. 81,87You et al. introduced iridium to Ni-LDH to form a NiIr-LDH monolayer. 81NiIr-LDH was synthesised through a coprecipitation process using metal precursors in formamide.NiIr-LDH showed improved performance in both alkaline simulated and natural seawater with overpotentials of 286 mV and 315 mV, respectively, to reach 100 mA cm −2 and 361 mV to reach 500 mA cm −2 in alkaline natural seawater.In contrast, a commercial IrO 2 catalyst required 763 mV overpotential at 500 mA cm −2 under the same conditions. 81Stability was also signicantly enhanced by introducing Ir, as the catalyst remained stable at 500 mA cm −2 for 650 hours.Adding precious metals to nickel-based catalysts has increased OER activity, with both Liu et al. and You et al. reporting catalysts that can reach 500 mA cm −2 with low overpotentials.
Despite its natural abundance, cobalt has been included in this category due to higher supply risk in metal criticality studies, extraction complexities and projected future demand, ultimately leading to increased costs. 88,89Nickel-based catalysts have been increasingly combined with cobalt due to enhanced surface redox attributes. 90Yu et al. demonstrated the benet of using Co by synthesising NiFe-CuCo LDH. 72Using a facile and time-effective approach.NiFe-CuCo LDH illustrated good   65 Thus, it could be argued that the overpotential gures reported are somewhat deated, particularly as a relatively high IR compensation of 85% was used (Fig. 8b).To illustrate this point, for the catalyst to reach 500 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH + seawater (Fig. 8a), an overpotential of 355 mV is required, 72 mV higher than in 6 M KOH + seawater.
With only an increase of 18 mV in overpotential over 100 h, a degradation rate of 0.18 mV h −1 and 71 mV aer a period of 500 h with a degradation rate of 0.142 mV h −1 , the catalyst undoubtedly exhibits excellent stability, with a decrease in degradation rate over a longer duration.The performance and stability of NiFe-CuCo-LDH can be attributed to the hierarchical structure of the catalyst, abundant exposed active sites stemming from the CuCo-LDH and enhanced charge transfer characteristics and corrosion resistance.Introducing nickel and Fe aided modulation of the electronic structure of CuCo-LDH, helping to improve electrical conductivity and, as a result, charge transfer. 72Despite its natural abundance, cobalt has a higher supply risk in metal criticality studies, extraction complexities and projected future demand, ultimately leading to increased costs. 88,89n doping can generate more active sites and optimise electrocatalysts' electronic structure because of the many different valence states that Mn can exhibit.82 Luo et al. synthesised an Mn-doped NiFe phosphide, denoted Mn-Ni 2 P-Fe 2 P. Mn doping and NiFe phosphide aid modulation of the electronic structure (Fig. 8c), which is conrmed using X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES), where the Kedge positions of nickel and Fe in the Mn-Ni 2 P-Fe 2 P catalyst shi positively and negatively, respectively upon introduction of Mn. 82 NiFeMn-layered triple hydroxide (LTH) 3D nano-owers consisting of self-accumulated 2D nanosheets grown on the substrate via the hydrothermal method.A phosphorylation process evolves the structure into 3D nanoowers and the Mn-Ni 2 P-Fe 2 P catalyst, creating plentiful active sites.82 The catalyst can achieve current densities of 500 mA cm −2 and 1000 mA cm −2 with overpotentials of 325 mV and 358 mV, respectively, 82 well below the 480 mV threshold for hypochlorite oxidation.However, all electrochemical experiments were conducted under an Ar atmosphere, a widely reported approach in electrocatalyst synthesis but not electrochemical testing. Stbility investigations using chronopotentiometry were carried out at 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 for 200 hours and showed a negligible increase in overpotential over the period, signicantly more stable than similarly reported phosphides.91 Metallic doping focuses on improving the catalytic activity of the catalyst and therefore improving the performance of the catalyst.A thorough review has revealed that, among other metals, Ag doping has the most signicant impact on the performance of a NiFe-LDH catalyst.This catalyst can achieve a remarkable 1 A cm −2 at a mere 303 mV and last over 1000 hours in natural alkaline seawater.However, the cost of Ag, currently around £580/kg, poses a challenge in determining the ideal development direction and would pose cost challenges scaling up.Mn doping, on the other hand, offers a better balance between cost and catalytic activity, costing only around £2/kg and achieving 1 A cm −2 in simulated seawater.Thus, it presents a better development direction for metallic doping.
4.4.1.2.Electrostatic repulsion.In DSWE studies, it is increasingly common to explore incorporating an embedded repulsion layer that electrostatically repels Cl − ions without affecting the exposed active sites, denoted as the electrostatic repulsion strategy.This section will investigate anionic (S 2− and P 3− ) and polyanionic dopants (SO 4 2− and PO 4 3− ) that are doped into existing highly active OER catalysts. 92Extensive analysis in 23,82,91,[93][94][95][96] has shown that sulphide doping and phosphide doping (anionic dopants) are very promising approaches to enabling stable performance in the presence of Cl − .4.4.1.2.1.Sulphide doping.Sulphide doping has widely been a disregarded method for OER electrocatalysts for water splitting due to the negatively charged sulphide ion (S 2− ) in its structure, which deters the adsorption of OH − ions to the positively charged anode surface. 97Despite this, studies for DSWE have explored the benet of incorporating an anionic layer as an electrostatic repulsion layer underneath the initial exposed active sites, attempting to repel Cl − ions while not affecting the exposed active site. 92Wang et al. synthesised a 3D Ni 3 S 2 /Co 3 S 4 (NiCoS) nanosheet that was fabricated using a novel one-step hydrothermal method.In 1 M KOH and 0.5 NaCl, as well as 1 M KOH and seawater, the OER performance of the NiCoS electrode is very competitive compared to similar sulphide electrocatalysts.This is likely due to the Co content within the catalyst, requiring overpotentials of 270, 360 and 430 mV to achieve current densities of 100, 500 and 1000 mA cm −2 , respectively. 98In 1 M KOH and seawater, the OER performance declines due to seawater's small particulate and bacterial contaminations (see Table 4).As a result, the catalyst requires overpotentials of 280, 360 and 440 mV to achieve current densities of 10, 100 and 500 mA cm −2 , respectively. 98owever, Wang et al. used an Ag/AgCl reference electrode

RSC Advances Review
during electrochemical testing, which, when exposed to strong alkaline environments, AgCl can become oxidised to Ag x O, leading to a shi of the reference electrode potential towards the positive direction because of the mixing potential of Ag/ Ag x O and Ag/AgCl interfaces. 99,100Using a Hg/HgO reference electrode would have been benecial.Stability investigations maintain the competitive nature of this catalyst, as over a 100 h chronopotentiometry test (Fig. 9a), the 270 mV overpotential remains constant in simulated seawater and remains stable over the same test in alkaline seawater. 98hiourea can be utilised as a source of sulphur 102 as explored by Song et al. who synthesised a MoS 2 -(FeNi) 9 S 8 /NFF, further conrming the benet of S-doping. 101Synthesis of the catalyst was carried out using a facile one-step hydrothermal vulcanisation method (Fig. 9b), where heterostructures were grown on a NiFe foam in a solution of Na 2 MoO 4 and thiourea (an accelerator to vulcanisation), which served as the Mo and S foundation, respectively. 101During the hydrothermal reaction, nickel and Fe are reacted with S to create the resulting sulphide.The simple synthesis provides a time-effective method for scaling up electrocatalyst preparation and is benecial for future studies.The MoS 2 -(FeNi) 9 S 8 /NFF required overpotentials of 238 and 284 mV to achieve current densities of 100 and 500 mA cm −2 , respectively, in simulated seawater.In alkaline natural seawater, the performance was slightly decreased, with higher overpotentials of 256 and 329 mV at 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 , respectively. 101329 mV at 500 mA cm −2 is the best performance observed in this review paper from the S-doped electrocatalyst containing Mo.The better performance can be attributed to the MoS 2 and (FeNi) 9 S 8 layer that efficiently controlled the charge distribution, increasing the oxidation of the NiFe site and adsorption of OH intermediates. 101sing a different sulphur precursor tends to impact the morphology and crystallinity of the catalyst. 103Jung et al. investigate using sulphur powder as the precursor for the source of sulphur, synthesising the catalyst by an established hydrothermal process. 95The performance of the NiFe-LDH-S350 catalyst (Fig. 9d) displayed an overpotential of 296 mV at 100 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M NaCl, in comparison to an OER test run on unmodied NiFe-LDH, which reached 100 mA cm −2 at an overpotential of 314 mV, illustrating that sulphidation enhances the activity of NiFe-LDH catalyst in a saline electrolyte. 95Sulphidation aids the reaction in saline electrolytes, where the negative charge from S 2− ions effectively repels the Cl − ions in seawater, decreasing the chloride corrosion, owing to improved stability and performance compared to the original NiFe-LDH catalyst. 95However, no detail on the mechanism further deterring OH − ions is given.Stability with the NiFe-LDH-S demonstrated a lower overpotential and 0.7% increase in potential during chronopotentiometry tests over 12 hours, compared to a 2.7% increase for unmodied NiFe-LDH (Fig. 9c). 95Further, XPS and TEM analysis was conducted on the sample aer the chronopotentiometry test, illustrating that the catalyst morphology was maintained over the tests.XPS of sulphur species observed the presence of M-O-S species post OER and demonstrated the mixed phases of sulphide and hydroxide, reinforcing the hypotheses that sulphur atoms are transformed into sulfoxide species within the matrix of NiFe-LDH, resulting in the excellent catalytic activity and stability of NiFe-LDH-S/CC. 954.1.2.2.Sulphate doping.While sulphide doping is a type of anionic doping, sulphate doping (Table 5) is a type of polyanion doping, as SO 4 2− consists of a sulphur atom that is connected to 4 oxygen atoms. 104The main difference is that the S 2− charge comes from gaining electrons, and the SO 4 2− charge stems from the net charges of each atom. 104Studies show that NiS x (nickel sulphate) layers act as a sulphur source, generating a polyatomic interface repelling Cl − ions from etching corrosion. 34,54,94ighlighting the Cl − repulsion of NiS x , embedded layer, Li et al. prepared a Ni 3 S 2 -MoS 2 -Ni 3 S 2 on NF as an OER electrode for efficient DSWE. 94The electrocatalyst is a mix of nickel sulphide (Ni 3 S 2 ) and NiS x .Since the authors state that the polyanion sulphate layer is responsible for Cl − ion repulsion, it has been included in the sulphate section.The Ni 3 S 2 -MoS 2 -Ni 3 S 2 @NF electrode was synthesised using a two-step hydrothermal process (Fig. 10a).MoS 2 microspheres evolved on the Ni 3 S 2 surface by decomposition of (NH 4 ) 2 MoS 4 using a hydrazine hydrate (HZH) reduction reaction. 94The MoS 2 layer provides benecial metallic properties and abundant active sites coupled with NiS x , which boosts electron transfer and improves water-splitting efficiency. 94A subsequent hydrothermal process anchors Ni 3 S 2 nanoparticles onto the MoS 2 coating. 94This is a sandwich Ni 3 S 2 layer that provides chloride corrosion protection on the exterior and interior of the electrode.In 1 M KOH and 0.5 M NaCl (pH 14) at room temperature, chronopotentiometry was carried out over a 50 h period at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 , which induced a modest overpotential of 330 mV.Over 50 h, the catalyst remained stable, with a negligible increase in overpotential (330 mV to 331 mV), demonstrating a 0.02 mV h −1 degradation rate, the lowest observed in the literature covered in this review, conrming the OER stability of the sulphide-rich NiS x sandwich layers on Ni 3 S 2 -MoS 2 -Ni 3 S 2 @NF in simulated seawater. 94The NiS x layers repelled Cl − within seawater from the surface of the electrode.With the stability achieved, it would have been benecial to increase the duration of the experiment to explore whether it remains consistent and comparable to similar studies.Doping NiMo catalysts with polyanions such as sulphate to prevent chloride corrosion while beneting from a reduced energy barrier to the OER is a desirable combination and has thus been explored by a few authors. 105,106,108To this end, Wang et al. synthesised 3D core-shell nanostructures incorporating a crystalline and amorphous NiFe-LDH that is placed on sulphur-doped NiMoO 4 nanorods supported on a NF substrate. 105The electrocatalyst is synthesised using a timeconsuming three-step process consisting of hydrothermal, vulcanisation and electrodeposition techniques.When tested in simulated seawater and natural seawater at 100 mA cm −2 , the overpotential was 273 mV and 315 mV, respectively.This decline in performance is attributable to the bacteria and microbes present in raw seawater, fouling electrodes and poisoning catalysts. 105Post OER XPS (Fig. 10c) analysis reveals that the peak of the metal-S bond disappears and the peak intensity for SO 4 2− increases substantially, indicating surface reconstruction and thus, the corrosion resistance can be attributed to the multivalent sulfate ions. 105The study also uses a substantial IR compensation of 90%, which can signicantly inate the reported performance.The study argues that the incorporated SO 4 2− ions repel Cl − ions present in seawater; however, the effectiveness of the catalyst to withstand a simulated seawater electrolyte was limited, as proven in a chronoamperometry test conducted in 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl reveals the instability of the catalyst, where at 60 mA cm −2 even over a relatively short period of 20 h, the current density attenuation rate is 3% and increases to 5% in 1 M KOH and seawater.However, the reason why this occurs is not given.It is likely the catalyst begins to shed off the substrate, as seen as the darker layer within the cell setup (Fig. 10b), and it appears not all the electrode is submerged in the electrolyte, meaning not all the surface area is used in the reaction and over the stability test  duration the concentration of the electrolyte will change as OH − are evolved into O 2 .Critically, the reduction in stability with the catalyst is likely due to the cell setup rather than the activity of the catalyst; similar electrocatalysts 94 present signicantly better stability without being vastly different in metals used, demonstrating that the structure and organisation of catalyst layers in the electrode are fundamental.Retaining the attachment of various metals and compounds to substrates and supports becomes progressively challenging. 109This difficulty is compounded at higher current densities where gas evolution is more intense, increasing the likelihood of catalyst shedding or peel-off.Using binders such as Naon ionomers, anion exchange ionomers, and non-ionic PTFE binders can aid catalyst adhesion to the substrate. 109Naon acts as an effective binder and further improves the interfacial interaction between electrolyte and catalyst, improving stability and performance by up to 20% compared to Naon-free catalyst layers. 110an et al. synthesised a Mo-doped Ni 3 S 2 nanocluster array applied to NF (Mo-Ni 3 S 2 /NF), where the catalyst is prepared using a single-step modied solvothermal methodology using thiourea as the sulphur source at 160 °C for 6 hours. 106The introduction of Mo progresses the nickel and S organisation, improving electronic interactions and increasing OER reaction kinetics and long-term stability, according to the authors. 106The performance tests for the catalyst were carried out in both 1 M KOH and seawater (collected from Shenzhen, China), with overpotentials of 212 mV at 10 mA cm −2 and 291 mV at 100 mA cm −2 . 106Impressively, the performance in alkaline seawater is almost identical to that in alkaline freshwater at modest current densities (Fig. 10d), demonstrating the chloride repellence of the S ions at the electrode surface.Furthermore, the remarkable stability of the Mo-Ni 3 S 2 /NF can be observed for >500 h at 100 mA cm −2 but uses IR compensation without stating that value nor the overpotential increase.The stability can be attributed to the presence of residual sulphate polyanions on the surface of the catalyst, as illustrated using time-of-ight secondary-ion mass spectrometry (TOF-SIMS) (Fig. 10e).This study demonstrates the benet of sulphate doping on stability and Mo doping brings to the OER activity; further research could benet from building upon this work to improve the ability to achieve high current densities.
Modication to electrocatalysts typically involves adopting a subsequent synthesis step or increasing the complexity of synthesis.As a result, increasing the efficiency of catalyst synthesis is vital when creating an easy electrocatalyst to scale up.Yu et al. synthesised a highly porous S-doped NiFe (oxy) hydroxide (S-(Ni, Fe)OOH) via a more efficient approach than existing electrodeposition techniques that tend to result in weak contact between the catalyst and substrate. 71NF is immersed and reacted with a solution of Fe(NO) 3 $9H 2 O and sodium thiosulfate (Na 2 S 2 O 3 $5H 2 O) and instantly etched to produce the highly porous NiFe oxy-hydroxide layer. 71Immersing the substrate in a precursor solution is not a convincing method to improve adhesion between substrate and catalyst.The authors argue that good contact between the catalyst and substrate is created.Still, at higher current densities, rapid gas diffusion will occur and put stress on the catalyst and substrate contact.
The high porosity, hydrophilic features and large surface area result in remarkable catalytic performance within a seawater electrolyte; the performance is 300, 398 and 462 mV at current densities of 100, 500 and 1000 mA cm −2 , respectively.At 462 mV, the overpotential is very close to entering a region where the ClOR can theoretically evolve.Stability tests were conducted for 100 h at a current density of 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 in varying electrolytes.The stability will be due to the sulphur groups present on the catalyst surface, which are in the form of thiosulphate and sulphate stemming from the oxidation of Na 2 S 2 O 3 during the reaction; this is conrmed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). 71A 0.7 mV h −1 degradation rate is seen at 500 mA cm −2 and a 0.5 mV h −1 degradation rate at 100 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH + 1 M NaCl, which is high but still better than many earth-abundant OER electrocatalysts reported in the literature 65,71,91 but lacking behind electrocatalysts containing metals of high economic value in this review.
Using sodium thiosulfate as a sulphate source is further explored by Zhang et al. who synthesised an S-doped NiFe oxide/ hydroxide with a CC substrate, denoted S-NiFeO x H y /CC. 107The electrocatalyst was synthesised using a two-step electrodeposition and hydrothermal method. 107SEM images (Fig. 10f) reveal that the S-doped layer was sparsely distributed across the surface and loosely bonded to the electrode surface, which puts doubt on the Cl − repellency of the coating due to a large surface area of active sites exposed to Cl − ions but may explain why the catalyst can achieve lower overpotentials than other S-doped layer catalysts since the inherent negative charge can also repel OH − .In 1 M KOH and 0.5 M NaCl at current densities of 10, 100 and 500 mA cm −2 , the overpotentials are 265, 331 and 409 mV, respectively; in comparison to the other reported Sdoped oxides and hydroxides, these overpotentials are competitive. 71,95,107he use of sulphur powder was initially explored in the sulphide section but is further used by Kuang et al. who report a polyanion sulphate and carbonate passivated NiFe, NiS x , NF core anode (Ni 3 ) (Fig. 10g), demonstrating increased activity and corrosion resistance in an alkaline electrolyte containing chloride. 23The anode comprises negatively charged polyanions produced from the constant current activation of the NiS layer.This involves the oxidation of the NiS layer, causing anodic etching and leading to the formation of sulphate ions that subsequently migrated to the NiFe layer, intercalating with the carbonate ions known to exist in the KOH solution.As a result, the fundamental nickel sulphate layer is created, which repels Cl − anions that occur in seawater, creating corrosion resistance. 23The authors argue that a polyatomic anion layer beneath the main catalyst layer inhibits chloride corrosion by enabling the reactant to diffuse into the bulk solution once created at the catalyst interface.However, this doesn't explain the ion selectivity of the catalyst; there is no mechanism establishing whether the catalyst solely attracts OH − ions over Cl − ions.Increasing electron density around the catalyst layer hinders further OH − adsorption and thus O 2 gas evolution, meaning a high activation energy is required to overcome the O-O coupling thermodynamic barrier. 23,77According to the research, the catalyst can achieve a 380 mV overpotential at 1.5 A cm −2 in 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl.However, it is mentioned that a 95% iR compensation is used, which likely overcompensated the results, particularly at high current densities (>1 A cm −2 ), enough to change a 'mediocre' catalyst into a 'promising' catalyst, typically an iR compensation in the region 80-85% is reasonable. 111The electrolyser could achieve a current density of 400 mA cm −2 with a cell potential of only 2.1 V under natural seawater conditions with 1 M KOH added to seawater at room temperature.The electrolyser only required a potential of 1.72 V at industrial electrolysis conditions at 80 °C. 23The paper further identied that it was possible to maintain current density levels of 400, 800 and 1000 mA cm −2 in the system for 500 hours in 1 M KOH and 0.5 M NaCl. 23Critically, while the high iR compensation is not excellent practice from the authors, Kuang et al. have synthesised a very stable and durable OER electrocatalyst, showing real promise for seawater electrolysis; the performance is still achieved in a natural seawater environment.Not only that, but the duration of the test also simulates a real-world exposure (1000 hours = 41.66 days), the longest of any catalyst tested in this review.
4.4.1.2.3.Phosphide doping.Phosphide (P 3-) doping has gained attention for modifying OER electrocatalysts due to high intrinsic catalytic activity, tuneable composition, and structure. 91,112Wu et al. presented a bimetallic ternary phosphide heterostructured Ni 2 P-Fe 2 P electrocatalyst that incorporated a nanosheet morphology on an NF substrate using phosphidation (Table 6). 91he catalyst was synthesised using a three-step approach (Fig. 11a) involving multiple immersion steps.Firstly, a facile "etching growth" method by which NF is immersed in 3 M HCl and DI water, creating uniform nanosheets which change the sample's wettability to hydrophobic, allowing more Fe cations to load onto the catalyst.The substrate was immersed in an iron nitrate solution to initiate ion exchange with the Fe cations, creating (Ni, Fe)(OH) 2 .A nal phosphidation process creates Ni 2 P-Fe 2 P/NF. 91Critically, the immersion process will likely lead to a weak bond between the catalyst and substrate without articial binders.As the catalyst is subjected to higher current densities with vigorous bubble formation, it may strain the catalyst, affecting stability.In 1 M KOH and seawater, it exhibited overpotentials of 305 mV and 431 mV at current densities of 100 mA cm −2 and 1000 mA cm −2 , respectively. 91The performance can be attributed to the synergistic effect of the binary components (Ni and Fe).Furthermore, the nanosheet construction and hydrophilic feature aid the diffusion of the  Review RSC Advances electrolyte and improve the discharge of gases. 91Good stability is observed at 100 mA cm −2 for a continuous 36 hours and subsequent 23 hours at 500 mA cm −2 (Fig. 11b).At 500 mA cm −2 , the potential gradually increases by approximately 50 mV, indicating a high degradation rate of 2.17 mV h −1 and eventually leading to complete deterioration of the catalyst.Critically, the study lacks the performance and stability attributes observed in similarly reported catalysts for DSWE.4][115] Song et al. 93 investigated this and synthesised a Mo-doped OER catalyst, using phosphate-doping to create Mo-NiFe-PO 3 /NFF using a two-step hydrothermal and annealing approach.The nickeliron foam (NFF) is etched in place via chemical oxidation in a solution of Na 2 MoO 4 and H 2 O 2, creating a hollow 'bird nest' structure, where sheets of Mo-doped NiFe hydroxide act as the wall.
Annealing phosphorylation transforms the hydroxide into Mo-doped NiFe phosphate.SEM images reveal the catalyst's consistent distribution and good adhesion on the substrate (Fig. 12a).Mo provides high corrosion resistance due to the link Overpotentials to achieve current density: h (mV) Mo-NiFe-PO 3 /NFF 93 100 1 M KOH + seawater 1.65 + 1.78 respectively 100, 500 + 1000 263@100 311@500 356@1000 S-NiFe-Pi/NFF 116 100 1 M KOH + seawater 1.68 @ 100 + 1.8 @ 500 100 + 500 241@100 295@500 325@1000 with phosphate polyanions, which resist Cl − ions on the surface in seawater. 93In 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl, the electrocatalyst can achieve current densities of 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 with overpotentials of 247 and 294 mV, respectively.In 1 M KOH + seawater, the overpotentials rise to 263 and 311 mV for the same current densities.Surprisingly, it reaches 1 A cm −2 with an overpotential of 356 mV, which is impressive and only 53 mV higher than Ag/NiFe-LDH. 80The increase in potential when using natural seawater is attributed to the fact that the small particles and bacterial contaminations in seawater can block active sites and contaminate the catalyst. 93While the overpotentials are highly competitive with other reported electrocatalysts, stability is limited.The paper highlights a 100 h chronoamperometry test in 1 M KOH + seawater at approx. 100 mA cm −2 , the current density uctuates throughout the test and maintains 93.4% of the original level, a 6.6% decline over a 100 h period, which highlights some issues for further stability improvement.Song et al. recently synthesised a combination of a polyanion and anionic doping, namely an S-modied NiFe phosphate (Pi) on NiFe foam (NFF).Synthesis of the S-NiFe-Pi/NFF uses a threestep approach (Fig. 12b), incorporating an in situ oxidationphosphorylation-anion regulation process. 116Interestingly, the authors add the sulphur layer as the primary layer to repel Cl − ions.The sulphur layer replaces the phosphate ion (PO 4 3− ), becoming the dominant anion-repellent layer. 116The introduction of the S 2− layer has been explored by a few works.However, no study describes an in-depth mechanism behind this, specically the need for ion selectivity from the electrode surface.In 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl, the electrode could achieve 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 with overpotentials of 232 mV and 278 mV, respectively.In 1 M KOH + seawater, the same current densities can be achieved with overpotentials of 241 mV at 100 mA cm −2 and 295 mV at 500 mA cm −2 .Furthermore, the catalyst can reach 1 A cm −2 with an overpotential of 325 mV. 116nterestingly, the paper also investigates the performance of the catalyst without the S layer, designated NiFe-Pi/NFF; in 1 M KOH at 100 mA cm −2 , NiFe-Pi/NFF required an overpotential of 246 mV, which is higher than that of S-NiFe-Pi/NFF (232 mV). 116he S layer distorts the NiFe-phosphate lattice and improves the adsorption capability of intermediates, advancing OER electrocatalytic activity. 116Over a 100 h period using chronopotentiometry at 500 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH + seawater, the potential was held at 1.525 V vs. RHE, and the test showed that 86.6% of the original current density was maintained, meaning the current density dropped to approx.433 mA cm −2 , which is approximately a degradation rate of 0.67 mA h −1 . 1164.4.1.2.5.Other dopants.Some less frequently used dopants are shown in Table 8.Specically, nitride doping, a type of anionic doping and borate doping, a type of polyanion doping, both dopants aim to incorporate a repulsion layer that repels Cl − ions.
The addition of nitride doping can result in exceptional corrosion resistance, improved conductivity and stability. 29,117,118Nitrogen atoms alter the d-band density states, providing greater catalytic activity than metal materials. 29,119Yu et al. synthesised a NiMoN@NiFeN catalyst in a threedimensional core-shell composition with extensive surface area and high-density active sites. 51The synthesis provides an excellent example of how to mitigate catalyst shedding since the structure of the catalyst is a region of conductive NiMoN nanorods grown on an NF substrate with a layer of NiFeN nanoparticles uniformly deposited on top, ensuring effective charge transfer. 51This is an example of a self-supported catalyst; self-supported electrodes offer several advantages, including a more straightforward preparation process, lower cost, abundant catalytic sites, rapid charge transfer, and the avoidance of electrocatalyst shedding. 109This is achieved through the direct in situ growth of catalytic material on conductive substrates such as carbon cloth or NF or by using an oriented solid-phase synthesis (OSPS) method to grow the material vertically on the substrate.These features make self-supported electrodes optimal for boosting catalytic activity and ensuring long-term stability at high current densities. 109The catalyst showed excellent performance, including an overpotential of 369 mV at 500 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH and natural seawater, achieving 347 mV at 500 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl and 410 mV at 1 A cm −2 . 51This performance can be attributed to the stable structure, hydrophilic surface and high conductivity of NiMoN nanorods that are uniformly decorated with NiFeN nanoparticles, ensuring fast and efficient charge transfer. 51At 100 mA cm −2 for 100 h at room temperature, the current density decreases by 3.82% from 500 mA cm −2 to 480.9 mA cm −2 due to strong bubble adsorption on the catalyst surface, blocking active sites.The outer NiFeN layer evolved amorphous layers of NiFeOOH and NiFeO x during the OER process. 51As a result, NiFeOOH and NiFeO x mitigate the adsorption of Cl − ions from the catalyst surface and aid the conversion of OH − to O 2 . 51orate doping offers promise as another polyanion inter/ outer layer for seawater electrolysis.Li et al. present a threetier NiFe electrode with a conductive oxidised NiFeB x outer layer NiFeB x interlayer on a NiFe substrate. 96The catalyst was synthesised using thermal boronization with boron powder and a subsequent electrochemical oxidation process using cyclic voltammetry to create the oxidised outer catalyst layer (Fig. 13a). 96The NiFeB x interlayer improves the corrosion resistance, and the oxidation process of the NiFeB x outer layer initiates a highly active phase of g-(Ni, Fe)OOH. 96The higher Review RSC Advances oxidation state of the nickel created a metaborate (borate anion that has been oxidised (BO 2 )) involvement, improving the oxidation state of Ni, Fe(OH) 2 to g-(Ni, Fe)OOH through the OER process by nely tuning the electronic structure of nickel sites, allowing an increase in surface oxygen adsorption. 96This equates to the high catalytic performance of the electrode, which achieves current densities of 100, 500 and 1000 mA cm −2 in 1 M KOH & 0.5 M NaCl with corresponding overpotentials of 328, 400 and 470 mV, respectively. 96However, at 500 and 1000 mA cm −2 , the extra energy required to overcome the NiFeB x layer becomes apparent from the overpotential at 400 and 470 mV and is only 10 mV away from the ClOR theoretical potential region.Chronopotentiometry tests reveal good stability at 100 mA cm −2 for over 100 hours (Fig. 13b), but at 500 mA cm −2 , bubble formation is an issue but not signicant enough to cause the catalyst to peel off the substrate.The slight current peaks and troughs indicate the blocking of active sites by the formed bubbles.The paper provides excellent insight into incorporating boride layers into OER catalysts to repel Cl − ions.Still, a lack of insight into using natural seawater is a limitation, and the increased overpotential at high current densities compared to other polyanion doping methods is not competitive.4.4.2.Outer layer protection.A simple technique to enhance the corrosion resistance to Cl − ions is to introduce a protective outer layer to an existing highly active OER electrocatalyst; some work (shown in Table 9) has identied using carbon or graphene as an outer layer is effective (Fig. 14).Jadhav et al. present a Graphene oxide (GO) FeOOH deposited on bphase Ni-Co hydroxide, denoted as GO@Fe@Ni-Co@NF.GO@Fe@Ni-Co@NF has an intricate structure in that FeOOH is deposited on b-Ni-Co, serving as the active and stable OER catalyst, while the GO outer layer is used to enhance the corrosion resistance. 1212][123][124][125][126] The electrocatalyst is synthesised using a three-step hydrothermal, annealing and electrodeposition process (Fig. 14a).This complex and timeconsuming synthesis, compared to similar performing electrocatalysts, means regardless of performance, it is challenging to scale up, limiting further applications.Notably, the use of Ni-Co LDH in this catalyst was created during the hydrothermal step, where it is classed as a b-phase.b-phase metal hydroxides are chosen here due to smaller interlayer spacing (<4.74 Å) than a-phase metal hydroxides (>8 Å).A smaller interlayer spacing makes for greater chloride corrosion resistance in the catalyst due to the inability of Cl − ions to intercalate during water oxidation. 121,127The multi-layered three-dimensional electrode could achieve a current density of 1000 mA cm −2 at an overpotential of 345 mV (with iR compensation).The stability can be attributed to the GO coating on the catalyst surface and the use of b-phase Ni-Co LDH (Fig. 14b).compares the synthesised catalyst to a b-NiFe-LDH, which lasts approximately-280 hours (more competitive than most reported nickel electrocatalysts in literature).The GO aids in preventing chloride corrosion, and the catalyst can be further used for 378 h (i.e.15.75 days) at a current density of 1000 mA cm −2 with a negligible decrease in catalytic activity (10 mA reduction over the period). 121n addition to a GO outer layer, Song et al. investigated using a carbon outer layer to improve corrosion resistance. 120He et al. created a carbon-coated cobalt sodium pyrophosphate catalyst on a carbon cloth substrate, written as Na 2 Co 1−x Fe x P 2 O 7 /C on CC but denoted as NCFPO/C@CC.Synthesis is particularly complex using a 4-step process of sol-gel method, initial heat treatment, ball milling and a secondary heat treatment, one of the more complex synthesis techniques seen in this review.The electrocatalyst was tested in a solution of 0.5 M NaCl and 0.1 M  KOH, a signicantly lower buffer concentration than used in other studies to investigate the OER activity.A cell setup could achieve 100 mA cm −2 at 1.6 V (Fig. 14c), where the NaCl increased the ionic conductivity, resulting in an earlier onset OER potential and illustrating that Cl − did not inuence the performance.The OER performance stems predominantly from the OH − evolved on the surface of NCFPO/C@CC acting as the active sites, improving catalytic activity for the OER.To prove whether Cl − evolved, the authors performed iodide titration (Fig. 14d) to determine whether chlorine had actively evolved in the solution.A colour change was observed in a pure NaCl electrolyte at low current densities but not in 0.5 M NaCl and 0.1 M KOH (Fig. 14d). 120This illustrated that the ClOR did not occur in the active alkaline saline solution and is owed to the outer carbon layer coated on the electrode surface, which is further proved in a 100 h chronopotentiometry test where no increase in potential is observed.While the synthesis is particularly complex, it could be simplied using another OER electrocatalyst in future work.The carbon-coated outer layer demonstrated effective Cl − resistance; however, the effect of carbon oxidation of this layer is not studied here, likely due to the low current densities.However, at elevated anodic potentials, carbon corrosion could occur. 67.4.3.Ion selectivity.The intricate chemistry behind the selective adsorption of anions onto an electrode surface has only recently been explored by a few authors (Table 10).128,129 A benet of selecting specic ions to the electrode surface is mitigating the need for strong alkali addition (KOH) to widen the operating region for the OER, as theoretically only OH − will be adsorbed onto the electrode; this results in reduced costs for the setup ($800 t −1 for KOH 14 ).
The selectivity phenomenon is explained by Pearson's hard-so acid-base principle (HSAB), which states that harder bases attract harder acids, and the same is true for soer bases and  soer acids. 129,132Acids (metal ions) function as electron pair acceptors, and bases are ligands that serve as electron pair donors.Metal ions with high positive charges and small ionic sizes tend to be hard acids.The hardness of an acid can be dened by the pK a value, which determines the strength of an acid from the acid dissociation constant (how tightly a Brønsted acid holds a proton). 133Tu et al. demonstrated this concept using two different NiFe-LDHs, one of a highly crystalline structure and one of a partially crystalline nature (Fig. 15a). 129he partially crystalline sample has an amorphous phase intercalated with nanometer-sized facets.The study investigates the varying adsorption behaviours of OH − and Cl − and the inuence of crystallinity on these mechanisms.The catalyst was synthesised using a commonly used hydrothermal method set out in literature (immersing NF in 0.50 mM of Ni(NO 3 ) 2 , 0.50 mM of Fe(NO 3 ) 3 , and 5.00 mM of urea and heated to 120 °C for 12 h).The main difference between synthesis is that the partially crystalline used metal chloride precursors are added under intense stirring instead of an autoclave. 129XPS analysis revealed that the amount of Ni 3+ sites increased as the crystallinity decreased.This is signicant because Ni 3+ is considered a harder Lewis acid than Ni 2+ , and while both OH − and Cl − are hard Lewis bases, OH − is harder than Cl − . 129,134As a result, it is clear why OH − preferentially attaches to the borders and defects of abundant Ni 3+ sites during the reaction. 129While this protective layer could result in superior OER activity.Theoretically, increasing electron density around the catalyst layer can hinder further OH − adsorption and O 2 gas evolution. 23,77n 1 M KOH and 0.5 M NaCl, the partially crystalline catalyst achieved current densities of 100 mA cm −2 and 500 mA cm −2 at overpotentials of 227 mV and 257 mV, respectively.In comparison, the highly crystalline anode required 34 mV and 97 mV greater overpotential under the same conditions. 129This is due to the smaller number of active sites on the highly crystalline NiFe-LDH, limiting the amount of OH − adsorption, reducing the conversion rate of OH − to O 2 and why a more linear polarisation curve is seen from the partially crystalline NiFe-LDH.Stability tests were conducted over 24 hours at 100 mA cm −2 in an alkaline seawater solution; partially crystalline NiFe-LDH uctuated by 20 mV, displaying good catalytic stability with a degradation rate of only 0.2 mV h −1 .The partially crystalline electrode was more efficient with higher catalytic activity for the OER reaction. 129o further illustrate the HSAB theory, Guo et al. with no strong alkali buffers added to the electrolyte and only minimal ltration used for larger solids. 128The hard Lewis acid layer was added due to signicant current attenuation (∼47%) of CoO x in 1 M KOH & seawater aer 100 h, which is attributed to the evolution of chlorine species and insoluble precipitation. 128Cr 2 O 3 was synthesised as a selective layer via a thermal decomposition method and was selected due to Cr being the hardest Lewis acid amongst transition metals, with a pK a value of 2.05.Titanium (Ti) follows closely at pK a of ∼3.00.The Cr 2 O 3 -CoO x electrocatalyst in natural seawater can achieve 150 mA cm −2 and 400 mA cm −2 at a cell voltage of 1.89 V and 1.99 V (Fig. 15b), respectively, with an iR compensation of 75%.Impressively, the cell can reach 1 A cm −2 at 1.87 V via increasing the operating temperature to 60 °C and remain stable at 500 mA cm −2 for 100 h.Applying a hard Lewis acid layer is a new technique that has served as a valuable method for improving the corrosion resistance to Cl − ions.A further study could evaluate the catalytic performance in an alkaline environment.
Enhancing the catalytic activity of cutting-edge OER electrocatalysts remains a signicant endeavour, but increasing the selectivity of distinct catalyst layers is gaining more prominence in the eld.As such, some recent studies have solely focused on this aspect, aiming to address the challenge of improving the selectivity of OER catalysts.Bhardwaj et al. synthesised an ultrathin inert silicon oxide layer (SiO x ) on a Pt thin lm electrode to show the effectiveness of SiO x overlayers at repelling Cl − ions (Fig. 15c) in a 100% ClOR region (>500 mV) in acidic and near neutral pH conditions. 130The SiO x /Pt was prepared using a photochemical method (electron-beam evaporation).A range of electrochemical tests were conducted to investigate the ability of the SiO x to mitigate Cl-adsorption.The OER onset potential in Cl-free electrolytes is the same for bare Pt and SiO x / Pt electrodes at acidic pH.In a Cl − electrolyte, the potential for the ClOR for the bare Pt is observed at (∼1.35 V) 270 mV lower than SiO x /Pt electrode (Fig. 15d).The saline electrolyte of 0.5 M potassium bisulphate (KHSO 4 ) + 0.6 M potassium chloride (KCl) (set to mimic actual seawater conditions) (Fig. 15e), no oxidation peak related to the ClOR is observed at 1.35 V with the SiO x / Pt electrode, demonstrating the ability of the SiO x to hinder the transfer of Cl − .Importantly, what the study highlights is that the OER selectivity of the SiO x layer is impressive, given the unfavourable conditions for the OER, using a Pt, notably a poor OER electrocatalyst and using a higher Cl − concentration (0.6 M) than other studies 23,51,82,[94][95][96]107,120,129 as well as using an acidic environment. 130 Furtherore, utilising SiO x overlayers on more catalytically active OER electrocatalysts is anticipated to yield substantial enhancements in OER faradaic efficiencies within the same potential range investigated in this study.This is particularly relevant given Pt's observed minimal OER partial current densities in the aforementioned potential range. 130In 2022, Yan et al. synthesised a MnO 2 on a CC to solely investigate the OER selectivity of the MnO 2 nanosheet arrays.131 MnO 2 /CC was prepared using a facile hydrothermal method, and implementation of transition metals (Fe, Co and Ni) was subsequently achieved via an immersion step in a salt solution.The study aimed to investigate the OER selectivity of MnO 2 in pure unbuffered seawater.A constant current of 100 mA cm −2 was applied for 30 minutes, and a following electrolyte titration revealed the amount of hypochlorous acid formed over the test.The selectivity of the MnO 2 /CC electrode was 66.7%; it was found that increasing the content of Mn 4+ enhanced the adsorption of OH − ions, thus increasing the OER selectivity.131 As stated previously, performance was not the focus of this study, as MnO 2 /CC required 1098 mV to achieve 100 mA cm −2 in seawater.Interestingly, doping transition metals Co, Fe, and Ni separately had no positive impact on performance and resulted in increased overpotentials of 1140 mV, 1236 mV and 1465 mV, respectively, at 100 mA cm −2 .This can be attributed to the reduced Mn 4+ content when doping transition metals into MnO 2 /CC.Overall, the study proves MnO 2 /CC has sufficient tolerance to ClOR in seawater electrolysis and thus suggests valuable insight for a catalyst layer for further investigation with more active OER electrocatalysts.

Electrode design and application in DSWE
Thus far, the main focus of our review has been the development of OER catalyst materials that would allow for the direct electrolysis of seawater using the current water electrolyser cell congurations.However, to aid the commercialisation of the technology, the focus needs to encompass the entire electrolyser rather than just catalysts.It is worth highlighting that recent innovative efforts have been aimed at modifying the cell conguration to meet the unique requirements of seawater electrolysis.Dresp et al., in 2020, implemented an asymmetric chamber design within an AEM that holds two different electrolytes, 0.5 M KOH at the anode and 0.5 M NaCl at the cathode, mitigating ClOR at the anode and allows the cell to operate with similar performance to using fresh water. 135In 2022, Xie et al. present a vastly novel cell modication that uses an in situ water purication step; this is achieved using a hydrophobic PTFEbased waterproof breathable membrane as a gas-path interface while using concentrated KOH as a self-dampening electrolyte (SDE), which allows the cell to run for 3200 h at 250 mA cm −2 . 136However, we acknowledge that neither of these congurations supports the need for complex corrosionresistant anodes.Since incumbent PEM and AEM cells require a membrane for ion conduction and ensuring optimal safety of separating gaseous products H 2 and O 2 .The membrane presents a further challenge to seawater electrolysis, specically unwanted ion crossover and biofouling of the membrane.With this in mind, we explore a few studies on membraneless electrolysers and, as a result, their application to a seawater electrolyte, allowing the electrocatalysts analysed in this review to be relevant.
The major issue with membraneless electrolysers is the gas separation, the most widely reported types of membraneless electrolysers are 'ow-by' or 'ow-through' (Fig. 16a) type, where gas separation is achieved through electrolyte ow along parallel electrodes.The most successful ow-through electrolyser was introduced by Gillespie et al. in 2015. 137The owthrough membraneless electrolyser was the rst of its kind and utilised parallel nickel mesh electrodes and was named the divergent electrode-ow-through (DEFT) (Fig. 16a).The electrolyser could impressively reach current densities of up to ∼3.9A cm −2 at 3.5 V, using a 6.9 M KOH electrolyte at a ow rate of 0.2 m s −1 , producing H 2 with a purity of 99.83%. 137emarkably, the membraneless electrolyser was on a large scale (1 kW), making it the largest installation in the peer-reviewed literature. 137,138The study highlights the benet of coating the electrodes.It suggests that using catalysts that are selective for OER and HER and increasing the operating temperature will result in much greater performance and increase the development of compact alkaline electrolysers for various applications such as DSWE.As a result, using selective anodes discussed in Section 4.4.3 could be a worthwhile investigation for future research.
However, 'ow-by' or 'ow-through' type membraneless electrolysers experience non-negotiable gas crossover. 138Thus, some of the latest research is looking at capillary gas ow electrolysers, which are an example of a quasi-membraneless electrolyser, since gas diffusion electrodes are coupled with membranes.Hodges et al. present a state-of-the-art example of a capillary gas ow through an electrolyser that could be used in a seawater environment. 139A thin layer of 27 wt% KOH is continuously fed to the NiFeOOH anode and Pt/C cathode via spontaneous capillary action (Fig. 16b).A porous, hydrophilic separator is marginally submerged in an electrolyte, generating a capillary-induced upward in-plane movement of the electrolyte.The electrodes draw in a thin layer of electrolyte laterally from the separator, and any H 2 or O 2 gases formed transport within the electrolyte, creating bubble-free electrolysis. 139This means that the cell is not disadvantaged by bubbles blocking the electrodes, allowing full use of the active sites.Remarkably, the cell can achieve 500 mA cm −2 , needing only 1.51 V at 85 °C, resulting in an energy consumption of 40 kW h per kg H 2 (98% energy efficiency).The cell provides valuable insight into the simplied balance of plant and efficient energy consumption.Furthermore, coupling this cell with an ion-selective or (poly) anion-doped anode, as explored in this review, could be used effectively in a seawater environment.

Summary and outlook
Seawater electrolysis shows excellent promise and presents a genuine opportunity for an inexhaustible source of green hydrogen and an effective method for inexpensive energy storage.As reviewed, there has been signicant improvement in the development of OER electrocatalysts for alkaline seawater electrolysis, with a growing trend towards modied or tuned earth-abundant catalysts.The challenging task of improving sluggish OER reaction kinetics while mitigating chloride corrosion has been studied, and promising research has been highlighted.NiFe LDHs have shown the highest activity due to their signicant electrochemical active surface area and ability to retain the interlayer spaces, effectively accommodating a diverse range of anionic species, as discussed in detail in this review.While adding precious metals and metals of high economic value generally aids in the performance of earthabundant electrocatalysts, the majority of the literature is now focused on reducing the precious metal loadings.Remarkably, the performance of pure earth-abundant electrocatalysts is nearly comparable to those with precious metals.This highlights that additional cost does not necessarily lead to a significant boost in performance.However, the critical addition of Mo to electrocatalysts -notably when S-doped -demonstrates impressive and consistent performance in alkaline seawater electrolytes, as observed with Mo-Ni 3 S 2 /NF for over 500 hours at 100 mA cm −2 .It is incredibly challenging and time-consuming to synthesise electrocatalysts that contain metals with high economic value.Several studies have shown that at least a two or three-step synthesis is needed, while a single hydrothermal synthesis only takes a few hours.Adding an extra step could extend the time required to several hours or even a day, which limits the ability to scale up the catalyst.The hydrothermal method is a consistently observed synthesis method used thus far, as it is a helpful method to control the surface chemistry, particle morphology, and grain size of a catalyst. 140lkaline seawater electrolysis requires stability and durability, which has been a primary concern.Upon review, researchers have found that the electrostatic repulsion strategy is a widely explored approach to repel chloride ions, resulting in increased durability for OER electrocatalysts without interfering with active sites on the catalyst's outer layer.However, it is apparent that only a few studies mention that increasing electron density around the catalyst layer hinders further OH − adsorption and thus O 2 gas evolution, meaning a high activation energy is required to overcome the O-O coupling thermodynamic barrier. 23,77It's noteworthy to see lab-scale studies reaching over 1000 hours of testing, 23,80 but for practical commercial applications, these catalysts must undergo extended testing to mimic realistic use.
In short, a suitable OER electrocatalyst for DSWE should be robust, be able to repel Cl − ions effectively, have high electrocatalytic activity and have a high electrochemical surface area that is simple to synthesise while being composed of earthabundant metals/materials.Numerous studies suggest signicant strides have been made in the research eld, yet the successful commercialisation of DSWE remains a few years away.To make meaningful progress, a fusion of pioneering catalyst advancements and innovative engineering designs is necessary to enhance electrocatalytic performance further.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of global water resources.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Pourbaix diagram demonstrating the trade-off between OER and chloride chemistry.Adapted from ref. 24 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2019.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Scanning electron microscope image of Mg(OH) 2 salt precipitation deposits, adapted from ref. 47 with permission from Elsevier, copyright 2009.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Maximum permitted overpotentials for OER electrocatalysts, reproduced from ref. 54 with permission from John Wiley and Sons, copyright 2016.54

Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Schematic showing the structure of a layered double hydroxide (LDH), reproduced from ref. 59 under Creative Commons License (CC BY).

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 (a) Systematic synthesis of NiO x -FeO x @g-C 3 N 4 , reproduced from ref. 77 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2022.(b) Synthesis procedure of (Ni/Fe/Mo)OOH, (c) polarization curves of electrochemical performance of varied synthesis immersion times of (Ni/Fe/Mo)OOH, (d) SEM images of (Ni/Fe/Mo)OOH after 5 minutes of immersion synthesis.(b)-(d) Are reproduced from ref. 79 under Creative Commons License (CC BY).

Fig. 13 (
Fig. 13 (a) Schematic of NiFeB x electrode with a breakdown of relevant layers (b) chronopotentiometry curve of NiFeB x electrode in simulated seawater at 100 and 500 mA cm −2 .Reproduced from ref. 96 with permission from John Wiley and Sons, copyright 2021.

Fig. 14 (
Fig.14(a) Synthesis steps for GO@Fe@Ni-Co@NF, (b) chronopotentiometry test of GO@Fe@Ni-Co@NF, reproduced from ref. 121 with permission from Royal Society of Chemistry, copyright 2020.(c) Polarisation curves of NCFPO/C@CC in KOH and NaCl containing electrolyte, (d) colour change shown in both a solution of KOH and KOH & NaCl when adding KI, adapted from ref. 120 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2020.
Fig. 15 (a) XRD pattern showing the difference between a highly crystalline NiFe-LDH and an amorphous NiFe-LDH, reproduced from ref. 129 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2021.(b) Overall water splitting performance of Cr 2 O 3 -CoO x in natural seawater, with an inset image of high-angle annular-dark-field-scanning transition electron microscopic (HAADF-STEM) image, reproduced from ref. 128 with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2023 (c) SiO x /Pt electrode schematic selectively blocking Cl − ions and allowing OH-to evolve into O 2 , (d) LSV curve of SiO x /Pt electrode in 0.5 M KHSO 4 + 0.6 M KCl at scan rate of 20 mV s −1 , pH 0.8 and 25 °C, (e) LSV curve of SiO x /Pt electrode in 0.5 M KHSO 4 + 0.6 M KCl and 0.5 M KHSO 4 at scan rate of 20 mV s −1 , pH 0.8 and 25 °C, reproduced from ref. 130 with permission from American Chemical Society, copyright 2021.

Table 1
OER electrocatalysts with different substrates and corresponding performance in saline electrolytes

Table 2
Mixed metal oxides as OER electrocatalysts for DSWE

Table 3
76tallic doped OER electrocatalysts and corresponding performance in saline electrolytes mA cm −2 with an overpotential of 283 mV for 500 hours in 6 M KOH and natural seawater (pH 8.2).Notably, 6 M KOH is a highly concentrated solution, and it is well reported in the literature76that high concentrations of KOH can result in reduced overpotentials.

Table 4
Sulphide doped OER electrocatalysts and corresponding performance in saline electrolytes

Table 5
Sulphate doping for OER electrocatalyst for DSWE

Table 6
Phosphide doping for OER electrocatalyst for DSWE

Table 9
OER electrocatalysts with outer layer protection and corresponding performance in a saline electrolyte

Table 10
OER electrocatalysts with an ion-selective layer and corresponding performance in saline electrolytes